In my tests, Acrobat would have received a B+ for its conversions, and PhantomPDF would have received a C. Both applications converted Word and Excel documents to PDF with excellent accuracy, but PhantomPDF’s conversions of HTML documents weren’t as good as Acrobat’s. It contained many smaller formatting errors, too. Among the shortcomings of the PhantomPDF’s effort were a failure to include many images that the original user manual contained, and production of the manual’s first page as at A4 size (8.27 by 11.69 inches), instead of at standard letter size (8.5 by 11 inches). On the other hand, Acrobat X performed the conversion of this document and most others far more accurately than did PhantomPDF.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
May 2023
Categories |